Logo-0

www.amperspective.com Online Magazine

Executive Editor: Abdus Sattar Ghazali

About us | AMP comment | Muslims in politics | Special reports | Press center | Opinion | Civil liberties | Contact us

HOME PAGE

Opinion 2008

Opinion 2007

Opinion 2006

Press Center 2008

Press Center 2007

Press Center 2006

Press Center 2005

Press Center 2003-2004

Election watch 2006

Pope attacks Islam

Offending Cartoons

Anti Muslim smear

Muslim charities

Sami Al Arian’s trial

Lodi trial
 

CNSNews.com – July 21, 2006

Islamic fascism the enemy, not terror, says Santorum

By Monisha Bansal
 
The United States is not fighting a war against terrorism so much as a war against Islamic fascism, U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) said Thursday. But a spokesman for the Council on American Islamic Relations said Santorum's argument only empowers "extremists."

Days after Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush announced that the United States would fight a war against terrorism, starting with Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda and the group's political benefactors - Afghanistan's Taliban government. But on Thursday, Santorum said labeling the conflict a war against terrorism was politically "safe and misleading.". . .

Corey Saylor, government affairs director for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), said Santorum's comments give extremists legitimacy.

"Essentially what you are doing when you associate the word Islamic with the actions of what the extremists are doing is you are sort of empowering their own ideology, because you are telling them, 'Yes we think you are Muslims by what you are doing.'"

"The best word to use would be, extremist," Saylor said. "What we're fighting is a war on extremism, whatever its nature," he told Cybercast News Service.

"Just like we don't accept any kind of extremism from Christians, and anyone would easily reject that it's a Christian action to commit a terrorist attack, we would reject their actions as being Islamic," Saylor asserted.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200607/POL20060721a.html